Most of us undermine our biases and the role they play in our understanding. Knowledge consumed, is never in it's complete form, let alone the truth in it. What you consume is aligned to the set of biases that process the information. Not only consumption, your biases largely influence the application and development of information.

Biases are not bad. In fact, they're an incredible way to filter information. Biases are just another form of expressing your world view. They can be your strength and weakness at the same time. With regard to learning, your biases allow processing of only a certain context of information. This maybe useful because you're strengthening your viewpoint but a lot of times you end up loosing out on the underlying essence of knowledge.

Considering this, in my experience the best way to consume knowledge has been to apply structural learning. Pay attention to the core structure of a subject. Most differences are at a surface level. They're just perspectives laid atop the base structure that forms the subject. In other words, if you where it comes from, you can derive multiple equations from the base. Whatever fundamentals you learn, you can apply to a magnitude of experiences in your life and form inferences that suit your perspective, yet not neglect the essence of knowledge that is outside your world view.

A lot of arguments are not with respect to the fundamentals of the knowledge but the perspective laid on top of it. When you're debating with someone, you're debating on a perspective you've internalized which dosen't fit their world view. When you dislike someone, you're disliking a perspective they hold which you've internalized differently. You own your perspective and any infringement is insecurity to your world view, which fuels your life. Escaping this trap is possible once you relate your arguments to the fundamentals and then form conclusions that suit the context.